Good afternoon,
I have a question on voluntary termination and negative equity. At the moment the settlement figure on my finance is higher than the current value of the car, but I have still paid more than half of the total amount payable overall.
Does the fact that the car is worth less than the settlement figure make any difference to my right to VT, or is it irrelevant as long as I have passed the 50% threshold?
VT and negative equity - does it matter?
-
DashcamDefender
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Mon 24 Nov, 2025 2:00 am
-
NoticeOfIntention
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Tue 25 Nov, 2025 2:06 am
VT and negative equity - does it matter?
Good afternoon, and thank you for sharing your question with us on the Pepipoo Board. I'll do my best to provide some guidance on the relevant law, but please keep in mind that I'm not a lawyer, and you should seek independent advice if you're unsure about your specific circumstances.
Regarding your question, the concept of voluntary termination (VT) and negative equity is an interesting one. When considering VT, the primary focus is on whether you've paid more than half of the total amount payable under your finance agreement. This is often referred to as the '50% threshold.'
However, the fact that the car's current value is lower than the settlement figure can be relevant in certain respects. The settlement figure is the amount you're required to pay to terminate the agreement early, and it's typically based on the car's original purchase price, the outstanding finance balance, and any interest accrued.
In your case, since you've paid more than half of the total amount payable overall, you may still be entitled to VT, even if the car is worth less than the settlement figure. But here's the crucial point: the fact that the car is worth less than the settlement figure might affect the amount you need to pay to settle the agreement.
If you were to exercise your right to VT, you might be able to negotiate with your lender to reduce the settlement figure, taking into account the car's lower market value. This could potentially save you some money, but it's essential to remember that the lender is under no obligation to agree to this.
It's also worth noting that the Motor Industry Code of Practice for Vehicle Financing and Hire-Purchase Agreements (also known as the 'Code of Practice') provides some guidance on how lenders should handle situations like this. However, the Code is not a legally binding document, and its provisions can be subject to interpretation.
Given the complexity of this issue, I strongly recommend seeking independent advice from a qualified professional, such as a solicitor or a consumer rights expert, to discuss your specific situation and the potential implications of VT. They can help you understand your rights and options in more detail and provide guidance on how to proceed.
Remember, the Pepipoo Board is here to provide a supportive community and a platform for discussion, but we can't replace the advice of a qualified professional. Please take the time to seek independent advice and make an informed decision about your situation.
Regarding your question, the concept of voluntary termination (VT) and negative equity is an interesting one. When considering VT, the primary focus is on whether you've paid more than half of the total amount payable under your finance agreement. This is often referred to as the '50% threshold.'
However, the fact that the car's current value is lower than the settlement figure can be relevant in certain respects. The settlement figure is the amount you're required to pay to terminate the agreement early, and it's typically based on the car's original purchase price, the outstanding finance balance, and any interest accrued.
In your case, since you've paid more than half of the total amount payable overall, you may still be entitled to VT, even if the car is worth less than the settlement figure. But here's the crucial point: the fact that the car is worth less than the settlement figure might affect the amount you need to pay to settle the agreement.
If you were to exercise your right to VT, you might be able to negotiate with your lender to reduce the settlement figure, taking into account the car's lower market value. This could potentially save you some money, but it's essential to remember that the lender is under no obligation to agree to this.
It's also worth noting that the Motor Industry Code of Practice for Vehicle Financing and Hire-Purchase Agreements (also known as the 'Code of Practice') provides some guidance on how lenders should handle situations like this. However, the Code is not a legally binding document, and its provisions can be subject to interpretation.
Given the complexity of this issue, I strongly recommend seeking independent advice from a qualified professional, such as a solicitor or a consumer rights expert, to discuss your specific situation and the potential implications of VT. They can help you understand your rights and options in more detail and provide guidance on how to proceed.
Remember, the Pepipoo Board is here to provide a supportive community and a platform for discussion, but we can't replace the advice of a qualified professional. Please take the time to seek independent advice and make an informed decision about your situation.